TODAY'S 'Monster' story . . .
- By l.t. Dravis
- Published 11/30/2008
l.t. Dravis
I created and have written the nationally distributed marketing newsletter, BOTH SIDES NOW, since 2003. I authored two books, BOTH SIDES NOW, Sell Like Professional Athletes Win and DEATH OF A SALES MANAGER. In 2008, I introduced a daily column for national syndication to newspapers.
Potential atomic war between
The death toll from terrorist attacks in Mumbai?
Continuing violence in
The economic future of the world?
World poverty?
Famine?
The end of the Bush/Cheney reign of error?
No.
We’re talking about Samantha Power, Pulitzer Prize winning author,
graduate of
Are we talking about Samantha Power because of her accomplishments?
Nope.
We talking about Samantha Power because the Washington Post wanted
to remind us that last March she called Hillary Clinton (let’s be brave and
drop the ‘Rodham’ . . . okay?) a ‘monster’.
Why on earth would Samantha Power say such a nasty thing about the
Senator from New York, the wife of the 42nd President of the United
States of America, the woman with ’35 years of experience’ who broke the glass
ceiling by becoming the first serious female presidential candidate in the
history of the nation?
It is reasonable to presume that Samantha simply expressed her
considered opinion about a public figure.
If so, why would this story matter now . . . nearly nine months
after the fact?
Let me refresh your memory on Samantha’s ‘monster’ comment.
It was the spring of 2008; the Democratic primaries were smoking
with vitriol (arguably more from Hillary’s side than Obama’s).
As February became March, the
So, instead of giving Americans good reasons to vote for Hillary,
the campaign and the candidate decided to come up with anything and everything negative
– real or imagined – to knock down Senator
Recall the insane insinuations Hillary Clinton made about Reverend
Wright’s supposed influence over Barack Obama?
Do you remember the prime-time news spots featuring Hillary making fun
of Barack’s campaign of ‘hope’?
Haven’t forgotten about Hillary’s allegations that
Let’s put ourselves in Samantha Power’s shoes last Spring; she’s
one of Obama’s foreign policy advisers and she’s sick and tired of listening to
Clinton’s load of bull, so she refers to Hillary Clinton as a ‘monster’ in an off-the-record
interview with a Scottish newspaper.
Samantha’s exact quote was, “She is a monster, too . . . that’s off
the record . . . she is stooping to anything.”
Off the record or on, is it true that Hillary is, or was, a monster?
Who cares?
It was an opinion . . . not an edict, not an order, not a sentence.
So, when did people living in a democracy become obligated to hide
their opinions about people who would dare to lead the nation?
The when in this case was
March 7, 2008 . . . the day Samantha Power had to resign her position as an
unpaid advisor to
I don’t like that Samantha Power had to resign, I don’t like that
she had to apologize, but I understand that it’s over.
If the President-elect wants a bright, eminently qualified person
like Samantha Power to advise him on ‘transition matters relating to the State
Department’, why doesn’t the Washington Post get out of the guy’s way and let
him do what he needs to do.
Maybe the Washington Post thinks the back story here is that Power
and
If that happens,
We’ll read it; more than once if you get pictures.
In the meantime, give us ‘monster’ stories that actually mean
something.
Okay?
Copyright © 2008 by LTD Associates West, Ltd. All rights
reserved.
If you
have questions, comments, or concerns, Email me at
